My 2016 report to the General Assembly (A/71/286) is devoted to tax evasion, tax fraud and tax havens. In it I recall that the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (http://www.humanrights.ch/de/menschenrechte-themen/tnc/regulierungen/uno-leitprinzipien/) do not contain any provision concerning the obligation of businesses to pay their fair share of taxes. There is no mention of tax evasion, tax fraud or tax havens. Nor is there any mention in the commentary of the International Bar Association, as if businesses were exempt from human rights obligations in the field of taxation. Perhaps this obligation could be interpreted in the Guiding Principles under the rubric due diligence, but it should have merited a separate article.
The exploitation of loopholes has become the favourite play of an organized tax avoidance industry dominated by four accounting firms (Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and Ernst and Young), and avidly copied by others. It is having a disastrous impact on human rights. As reports have documented, these firms are setting the standards to suit themselves, working in collusion with law firms, banks and company executives, and frequently engaging in revolving-door practices with government. This behaviour illustrates a selfish approach to business, driven by short-term profit, which severely undermines democracy and the welfare of the people, depriving them of essential resources for health care, education, security and other basic needs.
This and other issues were discussed during the Human Rights Council’s second inter-governmental working group on the drafting of a legally binding instrument on the social responsibility of transnational corporations, held in Geneva from 24 to 28 October 2016. As a participant of all meetings of the expertgroup, I strongly supported the elaboration and adoption of such a treaty, albeit aware that there will be no consensus. The obligation to pay taxes and the prohibition of setting up shell companies, giving so-called “sweetheart deals” to corporations [attracting foreign companies with an offer of tax exemption or very low tax rates] and shifting corporate profits to tax havens must be specifically codified. This will allow filling the gaps of the Guiding Principles and ensure that soft law (as the Guiding Principles) and hard law (as treaties under international law) complement each other for the benefit of human rights.
The Guiding Principles have been around since 2011 and received lip service by States. Little has been done to make them enforceable. A classical example of its violation with impunity is the secret elaboration of mega trade treaties TPP, TTIP and CETA, notwithstanding the stipulations of Principles 9 and 10. There is no excuse for secret negotiations excluding key stakeholders such as consumer unions, labour unions, health professionals, environmental protection groups, etc. It is a disgrace that much of the information was revealed not by governments but by whistleblowers. Why this lack of transparency and accountability? Commerce is not national security – nor is it a human rights free zone.
The bottom line must be that any exercise of power – political or economic – must be subject to democratic controls. And in case of conflict between commercial treaties and human rights treaties, it is the latter than must prevail.
This Forum on Business and Human Rights should demonstrate that it can promote a symbiosis between business and ethics, that it can advance the enforcement of the Guiding Principles, lest it be seen as just another talk shop, as a forum on the business of human rights.
I thank you. •
* Speech held at “Forum Business and Human Rights – side event” on 14 November 2016
If you want to prevent the setting of cookies (for example, Google Analytics), you can set this up by using this browser add-on.