Curriculum 21 in the Canton of Aargau
cc. While similar school reforms such as Curriculum 21 more frequently have to be spelled back or secretly withdrawn because they show catastrophic consequences, the German Swiss Conferenc of Cantonal Ministers of Education (D-EDK) remains on its old course. Curriculum 21 is to be introduced throughout Switzerland.
For this reason, initiatives were taken against the introduction of this curriculum in more than 10 cantons, which are now being voted on individually. But instead of entering the expert discussion, the educational authorities of the D-EDK, BKS have passed over the initiative of disseminating pre-prepared sample letters and untruths to individual “school authorities” and associations, such as the school leaders’ association.
It was precisely this approach that was recently explicitly dunned again in another federal case in a Federal Court’s judgment on Article 34 (Protection of Free Will Formation).
In the following press release the Aargau Initiativkomitee “Yes to a good education – No to Curriculum 21” reveals exactly this procedure within the responsible department BKS (Department of Education, Culture and Sports).
On 12 February 2017, our “Yes to a good education – No to Curriculum 21” initiative will be put to the vote. Ahead of the vote, it is becoming more and more apparent that the opponency of the initiative, instead of a substantive discussion, conducts in an unacceptable way a propaganda poll which is unworthy of a democratic debate.
In concrete terms, we, as a committee decided against a top-down action launched by the Association of School Directors Canton Aargau (VSLAG), right before Christmas. This association attempts to manipulate the voting population of the Canton of Aargau by spreading a one-sided “sample letter” embroidered with false claims which, with official school emblem in the name of school care and school guidance, is supposed to reach all parents. The message is clear: the educational initiative is “urgently” to be rejected.
In a communication, we now have asked the cantonal school administrators and the municipal councils to immediately stop this action. Hence, official information channels of the school are grossly abused and the official duty for objective information is disregarded. If a school authority were to act in accordance with this model, this would be an intolerable voting propaganda and a clear violation of
Article 34f. of the Federal Constitution (the protection to form an opinion and the exercise of state responsibilities).
In this context, a student action at the beginning of November 2016 was to be remembered. At that time Government Councillor Alex Hürzeler forbade canton pupils to hang posters on the school grounds against the planned education cuts. This was described as an impermissible political propaganda. At that time, the BKS put on record: “According to the School Act, schools in Aargau are politically and denominationally neutral. Therefore, the BKS considers that political action must take place outside the school system.”
Additionally, the VSLAG sample letter to the parents originates by a cantonal official, namely Tobias Obrist (responsible for the introduction of the new curriculum in the BKS). This is scandalous and should have consequences. It is another example of the activity and interlacing of the administration of education with the school administration, which should adhere to the principle of fairness and should show restraint in the run-up to a popular vote.
Apart from this manipulative reconciliation propaganda, we still have to address a wrong argument of the initiating opponents. One of the main arguments of the Departement of BKS was from the outset that the list of subjects in the proposed new paragraph 13 of the School Act was “final.” To this day, the opponency of the initiative continues to support this argument, claiming that the proposed curriculum is a stiff corset and restricts the educational offer.
We have asked the renowned professor of law, Dr Rainer J. Schweizer (University of St. Gallen) for a legal statement on this question. In summary, he notes “that the new provision does not contain a final regulation with regard to any supplements to the curriculum.” His justification amongst others are the following four arguments:
With the clear statement by Professor Schweizer, a main argument of the initiative opponents, namely the enumeration of the subjects is “final”, is clearly disproved. The BKS has misinformed from the outset and tried to disparage the initiative.
Conclusion: Instead of a factual discussion about the basics of our national school, the BKS has been trying to put this wrong information into a wrong light since the education initiative was submitted in order to win over the Grand Council as well as the parties and associations. And just before the ballot meeting, the BKS is now launching a massive government propaganda campaign with the Association of Headmasters of the Canton of Aargau, in order to prevent the adoption of the popular initiative “Yes to a good education – No to Curriculum 21”. We strongly oppose these interventions in free formation of opinions.
For the initiative committee:
Press release from 9 January 2017
Donations to: PC 50-2808-7, Raiffeisenbank 8964 Mutschellen, Committee “Curriculum21-no”, IBAN CH47 8067 3000 0073 4124 5
 Schulgesetz nach Annahme der Initiative
Die Initiative verlangt den Ersatz von §13 Lehrplan im Aargauischen Schulgesetz (401.100) durch folgenden Text:
Unsere Website verwendet Cookies, damit wir die Page fortlaufend verbessern und Ihnen ein optimiertes Besucher-Erlebnis ermöglichen können. Wenn Sie auf dieser Webseite weiterlesen, erklären Sie sich mit der Verwendung von Cookies einverstanden.
Weitere Informationen zu Cookies finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.
Wenn Sie das Setzen von Cookies z.B. durch Google Analytics unterbinden möchten, können Sie dies mithilfe dieses Browser Add-Ons einrichten.