Perpetual neutrality applies especially in difficult times: The Austrians show the way

mw. On 15 May 1955, Austria became a sovereign state with the “State Treaty concerning the Restoration of an Independent and Democratic Austria”. On 26 October 1955, the National Council passed the “Federal Constitutional Law on the Neutrality of Austria” (Neutrality Law), thus subjecting the country to the 1907 Hague Convention (right to inviolability of territory; duty not to support any party, supply or finance arms in the event of war).1 However, Austria did not agree to perpetual neutrality along the lines of Switzerland only because the Allies demanded it. Rather, the population stood behind the principle of neutrality then and still does today. This is evidenced by the high level of support for neutrality among the population and politicians across the party spectrum.
  Unlike Switzerland, Austria has been a member of the EU since 1995 and therefore cannot opt out of economic sanctions imposed by the Union. By joining the EU, Austria has also declared its willingness to participate in the common foreign and security policy. But in the Ukraine war, Austria adheres to the law of neutrality and does not supply war material, just like neutral Ireland.

Only 14 per cent of the Austrian population are in favour of joining NATO!

While Sweden and Finland are considering joining NATO, the Austrians remain undeterred in their neutrality: In a survey conducted at the beginning of May2, only 14 per cent of those questioned were in favour of joining NATO, 75 per cent explicitly rejected it. In another survey of March 2022 about the importance of neutrality, “a total of 91 per cent of respondents stated that Austria’s neutrality was important to them, even against the background of the Russia-Ukraine war. Only [...] 6 per cent, on the other hand, did not consider it important”.3 
  More cooperation of the EU member states in security and defence policy is advocated by 83 per cent of the respondents, but only 37 per cent want Austria to participate in an EU defence alliance.4 
  From these survey results, one can conclude that the majority of the population would rather support the strengthening of an independent European security policy outside NATO, with a willingness to cooperate but not to join an EU army. In this way, neutrality can be preserved as much as possible within the EU.

Comparison with the Swiss population

According to a poll conducted by sotomo in the SonntagsBlick in April, 35 per cent of respondents answered “yes” to the question: “Should Switzerland cooperate more closely with the NATO defence alliance?” while 21 per cent answered “rather yes”. However, “cooperate more closely” is a very unclear formulation. Wisely, there was no mention of joining NATO - apparently “Blick” wanted to avoid the expected resounding “no”. On the question “Should Switzerland supply weapons to Ukraine?”, the Swiss clearly showed that they want to stick to neutrality: 56 per cent answered no, 10 per cent rather no, which is a two-thirds majority.5

Politicians take a stand: “Austria’s neutrality is part of our national identity”

While Swiss Federal Councillors and parliamentarians are lamentably divided on the future direction of their own security policy, Austria’s top politicians across the party landscape are clearly in favour of maintaining neutrality.
  After Finland and Sweden applied for NATO membership, the question of whether neutrality is still the best security instrument for Austria was also raised in Austria.

  • Federal Chancellor Karl Nehammer (ÖVP): “Austria was neutral, is neutral and will remain neutral.” On joining NATO: “For Austria this question does not arise in this way, we also have a different history than Sweden and Finland.” ( of 17 May 2022)
  • Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg (ÖVP): “Austria’s military neutrality is anchored in our constitution. Since regaining sovereignty after the war, it has been part of our national identity. Vienna will always be a capital of dialogue.” Schallenberg added: “We participate in European security policy, but joining NATO is not up for discussion, and the Austrian people strongly support neutrality. In a world where conflicts have become more open on an economic, military and intellectual level, neutrality can be a value again.6 
  • Environment Minister Leonore Gewessler and other Green politicians also reject Austria’s joining NATO: Austria is a neutral country and actively lives this neutrality, said Gewessler. Some Green politicians added that “Austria should get more involved in other areas so as not to be seen as a security policy free rider at NATO”.7
      Note: In Switzerland, “free rider” is also a favourite word of some security politicians. As if the active foreign policy role that Austria and Switzerland take on – and could take on much more, especially today – had any less significance for the peaceful coexistence of peoples than joint shooting exercises!
  • Along these lines, FPÖ federal party leader Herbert Kickl: “As a neutral state, Austria has been able to act as a mediator in many conflicts over the past decades or has been a venue for negotiations.” Kickl recalls Austria’s legal obligation to neutrality: “Joining a military alliance is already not possible under the Austrian Federal Constitution – and that is a good thing.”8
  • Pamela Rendi-Wagner, Chairperson of the SPÖ: “Our active neutrality policy with a strong international commitment to peace has proven its worth. Neutrality is not up for discussion for us.” On the occasion of her visit to the German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in mid-May, Rendi-Wagner spoke out in favour of intensified efforts in the sense of de-escalation in the Ukraine war: “As difficult as the situation is, Europe must leave no stone unturned to bring Ukraine and Russia to the negotiating table and find diplomatic solutions.” The question of how to end this war must be brought back to the centre, said Rendi-Wagner.9  •

1 Republic of Austria, Parliament. “Was macht die österreichische Neutralität aus?” (What constitutes Austrian neutrality?) Fachinfos of 21 March 2022
2 The survey was conducted by the Institute for Demoscopy & Data Analysis (IFDD) on behalf of the Austria Press Agency APA.
3 Mohr, Martin. “Wichtigkeit der Neutralität in Österreich 2022» (Importance of neutrality in Austria 2022). In: statista, 14 March 2022.
4 “Ukraine-Krieg: Österreicherinnen und Österreicher laut Umfrage gegen Nato-Beitritt” (Ukraine war: Austrians against Nato accession according to survey). In: Der Standard of 6 May 2022 (APA).
5 Rafi, Reza. “So denkt die Schweiz über Krieg und Neutralität. Das Volk will aufrüsten” (This is how Switzerland thinks aboat war and neutrality. The people want to arm). In: SonntagsBlick of 17 April 2022
6 “Schallenberg bestätigt erneut Österreichs Neutralität” (Schallenberg reaffirms Austria’s neutrality). News ORF of 21 May 2022
7 “Neutralität – Frage eines NATO-Beitritts stellt sich für die Grünen nicht.” (Neutrality - Question of joining NATO does not arise for the Greens) In: Wiener Zeitung Online of 18 May 2022 (apa).
8 “Es braucht auch keine Modifizierung der Neutralität” (There is also no need to modify neutrality). In: Neue Freie Zeitung of 14 March 2022
9 “Rendi-Wagner bei Scholz: Diplomatie im Ukraine-Krieg alternativlos” (Rendi-Wagner at Scholz: No alternative to diplomacy in the Ukraine war). SPÖ of 18 May 2022 ("

Our website uses cookies so that we can continually improve the page and provide you with an optimized visitor experience. If you continue reading this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Further information regarding cookies can be found in the data protection note.

If you want to prevent the setting of cookies (for example, Google Analytics), you can set this up by using this browser add-on.​​​​​​​